Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:40
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
If You Deal With Pain From Sciatica, An Expert Says These Products May Help - HuffPost
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Fast-Track to Happiness: One Week of Micro-Acts Makes a Difference - Neuroscience News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Video: Right, We Need To Talk About GameChat On Switch 2 - Nintendo Life
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
When British people write X after everything, are they being serious or trying not to be awkward?
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Hic perferendis in et impedit quo.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are some good Caribbean islands to travel to with friends or family? Why?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Bono Educates Joe Rogan on DOGE’s ‘Pure Evil’ USAID Cuts - Rolling Stone
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.